The service allows Firefox to install updates without UAC confirmation.Coming about three weeks after Firefox 60.0.1, this point release isn't as imperious as it, but it updates the NSS (Network Security Services) component, a set of libraries for supporting cross-platform development of security-enabled server and client apps, to version 3.36.4 from 3.36.1 used in the previous release.NSS 3.36.4 comes with a fix for a crash related to authentication tokens like WebAuthn or PK11 on Apple's macOS platform, and a fix for an SSL_RX_MALFORMED_SERVER_HELLO error that might occur on some systems when attempting to connect to a server that was recently upgraded to Transport Layer Security (TLS) version 1.3.However, the biggest change included in Firefox 60.0.2 is a fix for a critical security vulnerability reported by Ivan Fratric of Google Project Zero. It's a heap buffer overflow affecting the Skia library, which could lead to a potentially exploitable crash. For when you need to use a browser powered by the same technology behind Mozilla Firefox, but you don’t want to use Firefox itself, this page will come in handy While Mozilla Firefox is of course an excellent web browser, other browsers you may not immediately think of, such as Tor, Pale Moon, and Waterfox are also powered by Firefox. These browsers (as well as others forked from Firefox. Mozilla released on Wednesday Firefox 60.0.2, the second point release of the Firefox 60 "Quantum" web browser series with an updated NSS component and various improvements.There are more than 100 alternatives to Mozilla Firefox for a variety of platforms, including Windows, Mac, Android, Linux and Android Tablet.Critical vulnerability fixed, improved font rendering on macOSApart from upgrading the NSS (Network Security Services) component, and fixing that critical security vulnerability, the Firefox 60.0.2 point release also improves font rendering on Mac OS X 10.11 and earlier systems when using third-party font managers and adds the missing nodes in the Inspector panel found in the developer tools.Mozilla also fixed this critical security vulnerability in the Firefox ESR 52.8.1 release. If you're using Firefox 60 "Quantum," you should update to the 60.0.2 point release as soon as possible after reading this. You can install Firefox 60.0.2 via OTA updates or download it for GNU/Linux, Windows, macOS from Softpedia, as well as for Android from Google Play store. Browser Mozilla Firefox selalu memberi update terbaru secara berkala.Mozilla Firefox. Mozilla Firefox Quantum -.
Mozilla Quantum Series With AnA few weeks ago, Mozilla publicly rolled out the update. Eventually, in a couple of days, I moved back to Chrome.Firefox Quantum, however, is no longer in beta. Unfortunately, things didn’t quite work out well. In a hope to be finally free of the Chrome monarchy, I had high expectations for what Firefox’s new platform had to offer. It’s built using the company’s own design language called “Photon” which abandons the rusty old rounded interface in favor of a snazzy and more flat approach. Design plays a major role and without a doubt, Firefox Quantum is the most aesthetically pleasing and modern browser you can install right now. More FoxyThe 57.0 update for Firefox almost revamps every bit of the browser you can think of. It’s been more than a week since then and here’s what I think of it.Note: This review was conducted on a late-2014 MacBook Pro running MacOS High Sierra. I downloaded Firefox again to check if those initial hiccups have been squashed off and whether the company’s claims had any real-life veracity. And that’s exactly where Firefox still falls a little short. Except for a new material design coat (which was delayed by a couple of years), Google seems to have forgotten about the front-end of its desktop browser.However, if you’re anything like me, the design alone won’t convince you to switch. This is especially more apparent when you look at how little has changed with Chrome over the last years. You can cherry-pick which elements should be on the toolbar by merely dragging and dropping them, how much space should be in between them and more.Firefox Quantum’s refreshing new design represents the ethos of Mozilla’s redefined path and I have to say, I’m impressed. Apart from placing components precisely where they would be the most helpful, it also allows you to customize a lot more than before. It’s relatively more pragmatic than previous versions. ![]() In my experience, Firefox Quantum was consuming way more memory and CPU than it should be. Unfortunately, that speed comes at a hefty cost. It’s not a noticeable difference but it is indeed superior in certain scenarios. The browser usually has troubles streaming HD content on websites such as YouTube. Now, this could be easily a bug considering what Mozilla is claiming but for now, Chrome is still the most efficient browser.Another drawback of Firefox right now is its inability to handle videos. Believe it or not, this is the only program I’ve used because of which my computer (MacBook Pro, mid-2014) had to kick off the fans. Since the company has integrated a bunch of homebrewed frameworks to make it all possible, critical bugs are bound to exist. Now, with Quantum, all that’s changed is just the browser is considerably snappier. Certainly worse than what Mozilla has been stating on its website. These differences won’t be obviously an issue if your computer has more than 8GB of RAM but for the rest, it’s an obvious dealbreaker.Optimization bottlenecks like these are, in fact, reminiscent of Firefox’s previous versions. That’s a massive difference and just not acceptable. Firefox is exhausting more than 1.5GB of RAM, while Chrome less than 500MB. In the above image, both the browsers are playing the same 1080p videos on YouTube. It took years for Google to fix the performance inconsistencies its browser was always criticized for. If the team manages to polish out even half of these shortcomings, it can certainly leave Chrome behind in the dust. Transitions between switching tabs also take an extra second which could be because of the new animations.You might think I’m nitpicking here but all of these together fabricate an unbearable experience, at least for me.So, yes, Firefox Quantum isn’t as powerful as Mozilla says. This problem could have been resolved with a third-party add-on but a substantial number of plugins have not been updated to be compatible with Firefox 57. Furthermore, I was not able to control web players like Google Play Music with the keyboard’s playback keys. For instance, profile pictures on Twitter will load a couple of seconds after I begin scrolling through the feed. Therefore I hope the company addresses them before people move on (again).Firefox Quantum currently also fails to one-up Chrome as far as battery life is concerned. Mozilla’s forums are swamped with posts discussing similar performance topics. But, not in this one.I’m also not the only one facing these issues. These hiccups could have been easily overlooked in a world where competing browsers like Chrome didn’t exist. ![]() Collections like Bookmarks, Downloads are now tucked away in a unified section called “Library” which yields a more clean interface.The mobile app also went through a similar makeover. Moreover, you can send tabs across these platforms if you’re signed in. There’s also a reader mode on both the desktop and mobile apps. Less FireWith Firefox Quantum, Mozilla is certainly headed the right way. Again, needs a few updates before I can recommend it to everyone. The most prominent one of them is the fact that it sometimes loads desktop versions of websites even if you have the option disabled. Fl studio standard vs ableton lite vs bitwig for macThe only thing I feel Google now needs to do is overhaul the archaic design which, even after the Material Design refresh, didn’t quite become the looker I was expecting it to be.Mozilla’s new Firefox Quantum browser tries too hard to dethrone Chrome and failsTruth be told, I genuinely want Firefox to come on top because I’ve been fed up with Chrome. In addition to that, it’s also a lot more consistent in terms of performance than others. As I said, it now uses even less memory than its counterparts. Firefox Quantum has the potential, it has the speed, now all it needs to figure out is how to bring to them all together without messing up the essentials. Chrome has been my primary browser since I can remember and I’ve tried every other platform from Safari to Opera but none of them are coherent enough to replace the oh-so-mighty Chrome.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorDanielle ArchivesCategories |